Under what condition is it advisable to split a scenario into multiple simpler scenarios?

Splitting a scenario into multiple simpler scenarios is particularly advisable when there are multiple distinct assets involved. This is because each asset can have different characteristics, vulnerabilities, and potential impacts. By analyzing them separately, it allows for a more precise assessment of risk that reflects the unique context and circumstances surrounding each asset.

For instance, if an organization has different types of assets like customer data, intellectual property, and financial information, each asset will likely face different types of threats and potential impacts. By addressing them individually, risk assessments can be more tailored, thus enhancing the accuracy and effectiveness of the analysis. This level of granularity helps in developing strategies that are better aligned to protect each asset individually, ensuring a more robust risk management approach.

In contrast, analyzing scenarios that are not distinct in terms of assets could lead to oversimplifications or generalized conclusions that may overlook important factors affecting specific assets. Therefore, the presence of multiple distinct assets warrants their consideration as separate scenarios to ensure a comprehensive understanding of risk exposure.