What is the minimum number of scenarios required for analysis when excluding multiple roles?

When conducting a risk analysis in the context of Factor Analysis of Information Risk (FAIR), the minimum number of scenarios required for analysis depends on the complexity of the factors involved. Excluding multiple roles simplifies the analysis, as you can focus on distinct scenarios that effectively capture the range of risks and their impacts.

Choosing one scenario allows for a focused assessment without the complications introduced by multiple roles. In this instance, a single scenario can adequately address the specific risk factors and their associated impacts without introducing unnecessary complexity. This enables a clearer understanding of risk while still allowing for an effective analysis of potential outcomes.

While two or more scenarios often provide a broader view and can offer insights into different risk contexts, they are not strictly necessary when the aim is to conduct a straightforward analysis absent of the intricacies linked with multiple roles. Thus, opting for one scenario can often suffice when you aim to isolate and evaluate a particular risk systematically.